Due may 9th 1 day to complete hume philosophy exam
Prompt:
In Section 4 of the part of Hume’s Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding {this is attached},Hume concludes that our propositions about matters of fact are not grounded in reason. Kant holds that at least some matters of fact are grounded in reason. Explain both Hume and Kant’s arguments for their respective conclusions. An adequate answer will include explanations of (at least) the following concepts:
Relations of ideas
Matters of fact
Demonstrative reasoning
Factual reasoning
Uniformity of nature
Analytic judgments
Synthetic judgments
A posteriori judgments
A priori judgments
Judgments of perception
Judgments of experience
Your answer should be in essay format, and should be a minimumof 1650 words.
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!